Rob Bell Rhymes With Hell

But he doesn’t believe in it, not in the traditional sense. I am currently reading Rob’s book “Love Wins,” and in it, he argues against the traditional idea of a place of eternal suffering for everyone who does not believe in Jesus. Although I am in danger of misrepresenting his beliefs before I am completely through with his work, my understanding so far is that Rob believes a God of love would not condemn people to a literal hell of His own making. Instead, Rob seems to view the afterlife as a place where people are able to see their own evils in contrast to God’s mercy and the only real hell is when people refuse to let go of the prejudices, hate, and well… evil… in light of God’s truth and love. Rob is a captivating writer, and for any believer in Jesus, there is food for thought in those pages as he discusses and exposes how Christian’s attitudes come across to others, and as he eloquently describes God’s awesome mercy.

There are problems however with Rob’s conclusions which I believe are wrong. Serious ones. And yet, there are thought-provoking questions which I am glad he brought up. First the problems…

First, Rob tries to skate by the straightforward meaning of the Scripture. The Bible doesn’t teach a symbolic hell, but a literal one. It may sound harsh to us, but what feels right or appropriate to me, does not nullify the Scripture. Jesus spoke about hell in a literal way, and John flat out describes “the second death” in Revelation 20. You have to do impressive acrobatics to get around those. Plus, it’s hard to ignore the obvious when Jesus said this in Matthew chapter ten:

Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.
-Matthew 10:28

The concept of fearing God, or especially fearing destruction of your soul in hell, does not come from a few isolated Scriptures but is found throughout the teachings of Christ, and warnings throughout the Bible.

I don’t have time to go into detail in this post, but in my view, Rob’s explanations of the Scriptures about hell, simply fall short and reach for explanations that are not there. Plus, there’s this:

Here’s a statement posted by Yahoo News yesterday. (Evidently Yahoo is posting comments as articles)

“The adverse reaction to Rob Bell’s hell among some Evangelical leaders is based first on deeply held belief, not economic consequences. But it should really put the fear of God in their accountants.”

Now the world’s idea is that churches control people through the teaching of hell, which as anyone who actually attends church, is a very short-sighted idea of what church, or faith in Christ, is all about. Evangelical churches especially are filled with non-paid volunteers for almost every activity they do, and regardless of their financial situation, would continue to preach the word of God. But the comment does raise a larger point about whether or not a rejection of the traditional view of hell would cause many to fall away?

For many no, but for some, unfortunately yes. As of this writing, churches that teach the Bible in a plain-sense manner are typically growing or stable churches, and the same goes for Christian organizations who likewise practice and teach the straightforward message from the Bible. That message is not only defensible (that should garner me at least one haughty comment), but it still works in the human experience. However, as more churches and/or organizations began to leave the plain-sense meaning of Scripture, would there be a falling away? With those groups I think yes. Contrary to becoming more popular, compromising in order to satisfy the culture will have the opposite effect and make those churches and organizations less relevant. Look, religion for the sake of religion is… well….

boring.

Why work so hard to be involved in the work of the Faith, when it doesn’t matter all that much? As Paul said concerning the rejection of the truth of the resurrection:

If the dead are not raised, “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.”-I Cor. 15:32

In the same way, I agree with Rob that people need to be saved from wrong thinking, and from their prejudices and hate. I’m all for that. But there is a huge amount of urgency added to the mix when the reality of hell is considered. It makes helping people, and preaching the message of the cross of Christ, worth sacrificing for and dying for. If God is going to fix everyone later, the work I do now is lessened in importance.

There is a reason why the description of Peter when they began to preach the message of Jesus for the first time goes like this: “With many other words he warned them; and he pleaded with them, “Save yourselves from this corrupt generation.” -Acts 2:40.

-And it’s not just because the Romans were coming, the Romans were coming.

Nevertheless, Rob’s book brings up thought-provoking questions about eternal judgment that are important to answer in this day and time. How is a loving God reconciled with one who judges people eternally? Is hell a place of eternal torment for everyone who goes there or do they simply quit existing after awhile? Who exactly goes to hell anyway? What about those raised in other religions? Those questions deserve answers which I hope to address myself in the coming days on this blog. But my point now is that the Christian world should work hard at answering those questions thoroughly.

Too often, we gloss over those things because after all, we’re saved right? If you don’t have to worry about hell, why worry about hell? Yet, today especially, we need to investigate our own beliefs and our teachings on these things because they are a roadblock for others. In this respect, Rob’s book has done the Christian world a service. It would serve us well to answer him, and the questions of others, with thoughtful responses, and not shrill condemnations.

After all, you can be wrong about hell, and still not go there.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Rob Bell Rhymes With Hell

  1. I don’t like thinking I can be wrong about hell, and still not go there, and possibly be responsible for many others going there!
    One church elder, when we were discussing the exclusive nature of Christianity and Jesus’ being the Way, proclaimed that maybe there were lots of other ways, and that he (the elder) was certainly not going to comdemn 4 billion people to hell, to which I replied, “that sounds like a call to evangelism, to me!”
    The one real glimpse we have into the situation is through Jesus’ telling about the rich man and Lazarus…we all have eternal life; the question is: where are we going to spend it?
    Love is not the warm fuzzy Mr. Bell may think it is. Love never lets the other burn in hell.

  2. I agree Jim. Just to be clear, my last comment was about our attitudes toward Rob Bell and others like that church elder you spoke about, namely that we don’t condemn Rob or any elders for their beliefs on hell. I would agree with condemning their opinion, but not condemning the individual. And naturally, I do think we should try and explain to them the Biblical truth as you did with that elder. I used to have a t-shirt that I wore so much I wore it out, but it said “Friends Don’t Let Friends Go to Hell.” So I’m in agreement with your response about hell 100%.

  3. Brian,
    When Rob Bell is questioning the biblical teachings on hell, instead of attempting to understand Father God’s justice and purposes, he does what many in the past have also done; he attempts to define justice in terms that are more appealing to Man’s sense of fair play. We, fallen men, are in no position to modify or reject biblical teachings that portray a frightening reality for those who reject the truth; salavation through Christ.

    Jesus said that “no one comes to the Father except through me”. I accept this as a fact, truth, reality… I also accept as a fact that God is just and merciful.
    For those who have heard the Gospel there can be no excuse–they either accept truth or reject it. Those who have not heard the Gospel(the truth) will also stand before Jesus. Jesus is the gate to eternal life and I trust that Jesus will be just and merciful. Why? “For now we only see in part…”

    The problem with Rob Bell’s teaching is that he allows for the option that we who have access to truth through the clear Word of God, can modify truth to suit our own idea of justice, that we can choose to amplify the grace and mercy of God while we diminish the severity of the consequences for those reject truth; eternal seperation from God.

    Emergent church philosphy is nothing new. The Deceiver plays the same games over and over for each new generation. Rob Bell appears to be one of his current well meaning though unwitting servants.

  4. I agree Greg and appreciate the comment. When it comes to the issue of hell, Bell and others seem to be trying to make God fit their own sense of how it ought to be, instead of simply trying to come to grips with who God says He is. The former results in what you mentioned, our desire to modify truth to suit our own ideas. The latter results in questioning and searching no doubt, but in the end a much better big picture of God.

    I don’t think Rob is going to hell for being wrong about hell, necessarily. He isn’t teaching against salvation through Christ for instance, (not in his version) and I believe Rob believes in Jesus as his Lord and Savior. At least for now. But this teaching of his on hell, and the assumptions that go with it like you mentioned, can ultimately lead to a falling away of the most important truths. And like any false teaching on peripheral issues, this has a way of deadening faith.

  5. One of the points Rob made about our attitudes toward hell, is how easily we can dismiss the world as headed toward eternal punishment. He had a point there. He sees the horror of it, and is dismayed by what appears to be our callousness. Unfortunately Rob’s reaction is to dilute the message. Instead, a better reaction would be to weep over the situation and do everything we can to reach as many as we can. Basically what Jim said above. It’s exactly what Jesus did.

  6. hey Brian,
    I totally agree with you guys,
    I would love to read Robs book before i have an opinion about it though.
    He has been very inspiring to me with his Nooma videos!
    Yet, i believe there are things that can be modified in Christianity to suite the culture, ie: worship style,
    But, the doctrine of Heaven and Hell are fundamental to the doctrine of salvation.
    Forgive the example, but, hell is like the timing on your car engine, mess with it and you’re going nowhere, slowly, just like everyone else.
    Then you start thinking pluralistically, that there are many ways to heaven.
    We have to have a healthy understanding of the Gospel, and the Uniqueness of Christ!
    There is NO god in any other religion, that considered sin and the consequince of hell more seriously than Jesus.
    No god but ours has scars, no god but ours bled because of the seriousness of the predicament we are in!

  7. We condemn no one.
    I like to think of it as the-thief-on-the-cross…no-one knows whether or not God had a quick final conversation with the suicide as he careened toward the bridge-abutment. No-one can say for sure where the other guy went.
    There will most likely be some surprises when we get there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s