If you’re like me, you hear American government officials and experts assure us that there’s nothing to worry about when it comes to Ebola and you wonder if they just don’t want us to panic. It spreads like HIV (and even then for only a few days) and therefore is highly controllable. Most fears are overblown, fear-mongering, especially if Donald Trump says it.
And then you watch the news, hear the doctors talk about it being out of control, and well… c’mon it sure seems like Ebola spreads a bit easier than HIV. Like one comment tweeted to the CDC, I feel like asking:
“We are told it can only spread through contact with bodily fluids-similar to HIV. But seems more contagious than HIV? Why?”
The CDC assured the tweeter that yes Ebola is spread like HIV and you need close contact with bodily fluids, and then only in a certain window of time. Ok. Granted.
That’s not exactly like HIV, which takes more than mere “close contact.”
HIV is NOT spread through touch, tears, sweat, or saliva. So says WebMD anyway.
Ebola evidently is.
The bodily fluids that do transmit HIV -like blood for instance- “must come into contact with a mucous membrane or damaged tissue or be directly injected into your bloodstream (by a needle or syringe) for transmission to possibly occur.” So says the government. I added the italics.
The CDC, however, makes no mention of Ebola needing to come into contact with a mucous membrane or damaged tissue. To catch Ebola, the CDC says you need only come in “direct contact with the blood or secretions of an infected person.” They go on to explain that it spreads in hospitals where people are not wearing “protective equipment, such as masks, gowns, and gloves.”
Then when you go to the Canadian Health Department, it gets scary. They add that people are at risk when, and I quote: “handling the bodies of deceased humans in preparation for funerals, suggesting possible transmission through aerosol droplets.” That explains the need for gloves and “protective equipment.”
Then shockingly, they follow up with, “In the laboratory, infection through small-particle aerosols has been demonstrated in primates, and airborne spread among humans is strongly suspected, although it has not yet been conclusively demonstrated.”
Again I added the italics because I was sitting there going “whaaaat???”
They end by saying poor hygienic conditions can aid the spread of the virus.
Ok, maybe the Canadians are fear-mongering despite the fact they are not named Donald Trump. I don’t know. I’m not a researcher or any sort of an expert on Ebola or other pathogens. Neither is it surprising that there is conflicting information about a disease we haven’t fully understood yet.
Nevertheless, it seems a bit obvious that Ebola is spread, and is spreading easier and faster than HIV does. The amount of close contact it takes to spread Ebola is much more casual, which is one reason why doctors don’t have to wear spacesuit-looking gear when taking care of a patient with HIV.
Hopefully, we will get all of these things ironed out, and the US government is not just trying to make us feel better. Although, between you and me, don’t you just feel like it’s just a matter of time before someone in America gets carried into a hospital and tests positive? I hope not. I’m probably just thinking like this because I’m trying to quit diet soda.
So onto the big question:
Why God? Why did you ever invent anything like HIV or Ebola? Or E Coli for that matter??
If Genesis is correct and God created everything, then one would predict in the beginning everything was “good” like the Bible said. Since then, however, everything would be breaking down. The Bible says this started when sin entered the world. The universe might have been created in perfect balance at one time, but when death and decay became part of the equation, we started to get more and more out of balance. So a creation point of view would predict viruses or bacteria would get worse over time because they would break down, mutate, or get out of where they were supposed to be.
There’s an article on this you might be interested in, so I won’t go into as much detail, but suffice it to say that many viruses actually serve purposes, or at least didn’t kill us. One virus was recently discovered that almost every human being has, which scientists theorize is meant to keep the bacteria inside our gut (we need bacteria) in balance. In fact without bacteria, the world would die. Turns out at least some viruses play a bit of symbiotic role with them and thus… are actually necessary. The implication is originally, before mutations took their toll, or the environment changed for the worse, that all these things were in balance, living where they were suppose to live, and doing what they were supposed to do. You have “good” E coli inside you right now, but there is one strain which lost some DNA somewhere that will make you sick now. Creation would predict that sort of thing.
Which means that if Genesis is right, then Ebola would be expected to have had some purpose, or some place where it could exist and not harm humans. For instance, the ocean is full of viruses but sharks and sea life still exist. (However, mutations or changes in that balance could also cause once harmless viruses or bacteria to cause problems. Like with the starfish dying off.)
So why did God create Ebola? I have no idea, but I bet in the beginning it didn’t harm anyone. I bet eventually we will discover it played a helpful role somehow. And ironically, if people followed God’s instructions on life, food, etc… We would have avoided many of those viruses. Weird, huh? It’s almost like he knew….
See, HIV didn’t wipe out the primates where it originally lived, and syphilis wasn’t killing sheep right and left either. Originally, things were in more balance.
Or as the Bible said, it was good.
Since sin entered the world, however, the earth is slowly “wearing out like a garment”. (Psalm 102:25-26 and Isaiah 51:6)
I’m convinced God is letting the ship sink slowly (the earth) so people will look for the lifeboats.